About the Corpus

Archive Statistics

  • Archivo General de la Nación, Mexico: 42/147, 28.6% of manuscripts are from this archive.
  • Archivo General del Poder Ejecutivo del Estado de Oaxaca, Mexico: 36/147, 24.5% of manuscripts are from this archive.
  • Archivo Histórico de Notarias del Estado de Oaxaca, Mexico: 51/147, 34.7% of manuscripts are from this archive.
  • Archivo Histórico de Notarias del Estado de Oaxaca, Mexico (temporary): 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this archive.
  • Archivo Histórico de Tlacolula de Matamoros Oaxaca, Mexico: 17/147, 11.6% of manuscripts are from this archive.

Document Type Statistics

  • Bill of Sale: 61/147, 41.5% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Bill of Sale?: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Complaint: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Doctrina: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Land Deed: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Land Deed?: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Land Description?: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Petition: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Receipt: 7/147, 4.8% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Testament: 66/147, 44.9% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Testament?: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are of this document type.
  • Unknown: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are of an unknown document type.

Language Statistics

  • Spanish: 58/147, 39.5% of manuscripts are in this language.
  • Spanish with some Zapotec: 3/147, 2.0% of manuscripts are in this language.
  • Zapotec: 86/147, 58.5% of manuscripts are in this language.

Town Statistics

  • Ayoquezco: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Guaxolotitlan? Santo Domingo?: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Oaxaca de Juárez: 35/147, 23.8% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Antonio Ocotlán: 4/147, 2.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Bartholomé Coyotepec: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Francisco del Valle: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Jerónimo Tlacochahuaya: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Jerónimo Tlacochahuaya: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Juan del Río: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Mateo Macuilxóchitl: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Miguel Etla: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Miguel Talistaca: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Pedro el Alto: 24/147, 16.3% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • San Sebastián Teitipac: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Santa Catarina Quiané: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Santa María La Asunción Etla: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Santiago Ixtaltepec? Santiago de los Angel?: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Santo Domingo Etla: 30/147, 20.4% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Santo Domingo del Valle: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Santo Domingo?: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Teotitlán del Valle: 5/147, 3.4% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Teotitlán del Valle?: 3/147, 2.0% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Theozapotlan: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Tlacolula de Matamoros: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this town.
  • Unknown Town: 19/147, 12.9% of manuscripts are from an unknown town.
  • Villa de Zaachila: 3/147, 2.0% of manuscripts are from this town.

Transcription Status Statistics

  • In Progress: 75/147, 51.0% of manuscripts have this transcription status.
  • None: 72/147, 49.0% of manuscripts have this transcription status.

Year Statistics

  • 1633: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1642: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1643: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1649: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1656: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1660: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1666: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1670: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1672: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1675: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1677: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1679: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1683: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1684: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1686: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1687: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1688: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1690: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1690?: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1693: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1694: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1697: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1698: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1699: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1700: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1701: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1702: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1705: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1707: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1708: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1709: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1710: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1711: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1713: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1714: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1715: 15/147, 10.2% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1716: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1718: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1719: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1720: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1721: 4/147, 2.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1724: 3/147, 2.0% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1725: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1726: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1727: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1728: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1731: 3/147, 2.0% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1732: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1733: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1734: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1736: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1737: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1738: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1740: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1741: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1744: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1746: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1749: 11/147, 7.5% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1750: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1753: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1755: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1758: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1764: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1776: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1785: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1786: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1787: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1789: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1790: 4/147, 2.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1797: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1802: 2/147, 1.4% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1803: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • 1832: 1/147, 0.7% of manuscripts are from this year.
  • Unknown: 19/147, 12.9% of manuscripts are from an unknown year.

Have feedback and suggestions? Get in touch!

How to cite: Lillehaugen, Brook Danielle, George Aaron Broadwell, Michel R. Oudijk, Laurie Allen, May Plumb, and Mike Zarafonetis. 2016. Ticha: a digital text explorer for Colonial Zapotec, first edition. Online: http://ticha.haverford.edu/

All content on Ticha is licensed under a Creative Commons BY-SA 4.0 license. You may share and adapt it as long as you provide appropriate attribution and distribute your work under the same license.
This works is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) license.